A quote from Charles Darwin:
“There is grandeur in this view of life, with its several powers, having been originally breathed into a few forms or into one; and that, whilst this planet has gone cycling on according to the fixed law of gravity, from so simple a beginning endless forms most beautiful and most wonderful have been, and are being evolved...”
Simple beginnings are the exact opposite of what is found in nature. But Darwin never saw what you can see in the forthcoming videos. He never had the remotest idea of the molecular world.
All of the molecular machines described below and information available via video presentations demonstrate something outstanding. That in the first living micro organisms on planet earth there is IT and nanotechnology of a type that mankind is still trying to fathom. Replicating them is a dream set far in the future. If we could, we would use them to power and energise all our energy requirements, thereby maybe saving the planet from our pollution. The machines illustrated have never been updated or modified and they work in you and I for the same reasons as they work in bacteria. They are the product of a designer who created life on principles which can be found, sometimes in necessarily adapted forms, throughout nature. To deny design in the face of available evidence is an act of intellectual self harm. On what rational basis can design be denied? I can answer that question. It can be denied if you hold fast to a faith or ideology that cannot permit something to be true. I believe that evolutionists, who fiercely deny the saying that design, such as is seen in molecular machinery implies a designer, are stuck in a state of religious, faith like rapture. Darwin is their god and evolution their bible and credo.
Here is an example of these molecular machines. A molecule is an electrically neutral group of two or more atoms held together by chemical bonds.
Taken from the lowest forms of life; from the very beginning are the first self replicating organisms on earth according to evolutionary theory: bacteria. These have motors as they need to move around in their liquid environments. These were the very first products of the life force envisioned by Darwin. Simple beginnings should be reflected in very primitive generators of energy and motility. So what has been found? look below and think seriously about consigning Darwinism and Evolutionary Theory to the junk yard.
These miracles of nano engineering happen to have just about the most astonishing motility system on the planet. In terms of speed and agility, flagella powered bacteria would make Olympic swimmers look like unfit, over-weight land lubbers, lying around a holiday complex pool while swigging gin and tonics. These microscopic bacteria can swim at the rate of hundreds of body lengths a second, and can change direction in a fraction of that time. An Olympic swimmer? One body length a second. The source of this incredible mobility? Bacterial motors that rotate up to five times faster than a Formula 1 engine. They spin their whip-like flagella and this motor drive propels the bacterium forward. Unlike made-made machines this little beaut builds itself by assembling its own constituent parts and routinely outperforms man-made nano machines. People who see this information and instinctively think in terms of purposeful design rather than randomly evolved over eons of time are laughed at by evolutionists. Evolutionists however discern nothing other than stupidity and ignorance from those like myself who see design rather than the absence of design. The basis for this contempt is that some of the component parts, or at least likenesses to them, are found elsewhere in other seemingly unrelated biological systems. This is true. So how to answer this crushing blow?
Perhaps like this; have you ever heard or seen or found examples of a designer or engineer, who having found a system that works, then proceeds to use adaptations of the original model to power other systems that would benefit from the same idea. In fact are there any designers, engineers so stupid as not to use a good idea in as many other similar systems as possible? Why reinvent the wheel when it has so many applications?
FORGET SIMPLE BEGINNINGS.
NOTHING MORE COMPLEX CAN BE FOUND BEYOND WHAT IS FOUND AT THE VERY BEGINNING!
This is mind blowing stuff. Please watch it and contrast the reality with the claims of evolutionary theory. Everything in the presentation had to be at the very beginning. The first simple bacterial cell had DNA, RNA and proteins. You need to see a biological cell and its parts and functions to even begin to understand its complexity. Scientists concluded that the average human body contains approximately 37.2 trillion. Inside our cells we have energy packs. We can do nothing at all, not think a thought or blink our eyelids without this ATP synthase machine working full time in our cells. It is the most commonly used “energy currency” for all organisms.
Below is another animation of this High Tech mechanism. Taken together these videos represent one of only two alternatives. They are designed systems, demanding the existence of a Designer or a freak of nature that just came to be, happenstance, like throws of the dice that turned up millions of times over as the number six without a single break in the sequence. The following video shows the cell in more general terms.
The speaker on the final video at the end of this article page, Ken Dill, looks towards a kind of Utopian future in which we abandon the often wasteful, polluting energy machines based on fuels such as coal, gas, electricity and petroleum. These dominate our lives and contribute to the pollution of our ecosystem. If you watch this videoed Ted Talk by Ken Dill you will hear a quietly impassioned appeal to turn instead to the kind of molecular machines which generate the energy in all living things, from bacteria upwards. The very technology about which Darwin knew nothing is now becoming the still distant hope for future technology and energy supplies. Darwin knew very little about the biological cell, it was still at that time a bit of a mystery and of unknown function. Darwin of course had no idea that hidden within these cells were vast numbers and many varieties of unsurpassingly brilliant machines, like ATP Synthase, the most commonly used “energy currency” of cells for all organisms. These amazing clean energy efficient microscopic nano-machines proliferated at the lowest possible roots of biological origins, and can be seen illustrated in the video at the bottom of the page. It is these miracles of engineering design that were Darwin’s unseen. unheralded “simple beginnings”. He wrote something very illuminating about ignorance.
“Ignorance more frequently begets confidence than does knowledge: it is those who know little, and not those who know much, who so positively assert that this or that problem will never be solved by science.”
Well, the truth is that he spoke the truth about those who know little, perhaps thinking that because his generation was then at the cutting edge of science he may have become immune to the impact of future knowledge that would catch up, overtake and expose his own ignorance.
The speaker in the video urges us to think of these nano machines as the yet to come cutting edge future for our energy needs. Thinking about this you get a glimpse of just how ignorant Darwin was; not through any fault of his, we cannot know what is not known, but we can be modest. All experience of science as its history has proves leads to a single conclusion: expect the unexpected and that a theory today may turn to dust tomorrow. As regards evolutionary theory in general you can easily follow Darwin’s reasoning. Anyone wanting to produce goat hair sweaters would choose to breed goats with long hair. A farmer might breed his wheat, or any other kind of plant or animal he cared to cultivate to be resistant to pests and diseases, for the obvious reason that more of the plants survive. These hopefully would evolve immunities to diseases and pests and therefore increasing their chances to reproduce and survive the rigours of life. People may breed dogs for an enhanced sense of smell. Flowers are often bred for brighter colours or a stronger scent, florists will select these for bouquets and floral arrangements. Colours and scent are also selected since these are the types that attract the most bees, butterflies, and other pollinators. What Darwin failed to take on board was that nothing he ever observed, including the famous Galapagos Island finches, ever evolved into parrots or sparrows or into anything other than what they were genetically hard wired to become; which was the next generation of finches. These may have, due to changed environmental pressures naturally adapted their beak shapes and sizes in order to forage for their food. The finches are still finches though, maybe with longer or shorter, fatter or narrower beaks according to their needs, but the same species. Consequently, Darwin if resuscitated and returned to these islands would have seen little different to what he first observed in 1835.
Darwinism should have passed away and been given a well deserved decent burial. He was in error about almost everything. A fact that has passed mostly uncommented upon by scientists who know all about the problems. However very few dare risk their careers and reputations. Because that risk is very real in academia, and those who have gone public and pulled the plug on evolutionary theory have suffered the age old stigma of the heretic. On the good ship Darwinism hangs the feeble hope of avoiding meeting the true creator and designer of all things; the one who set the most amazing machinery ever invented at the heart and at the beginning of natures journey into the future.
Watch the video below and you may come to the conclusion that the designer of these systems, had the ability to create machines at the lowest levels of life which outperform every human invention when it comes to motility and data storage. These systems: bacterial motors and DNA have never evolved, nor have they been updated or superseded, as evolutionary theory demands. Man made inventions evolve year on year or decade on decade. Each generation of inventors and engineers seeing further and deeper than the last. Strange then that there once was a designer who created motors and storage systems just the once, proclaimed them good, and then rested then from His work.